[Support] spamassassin / spamc: stark unterschiedliche pro user
Rainer Thieringer
hsnews at web-me.de
Tue Mar 6 17:01:03 CET 2007
Hallo HS,
ich verwende gleich .procmailrc und .spamassassin/user_prefs für den
Maileingang verschiedener User. Trotzdem sind die Ergebnisse absolut
unterschiedlich, was mir bei einem User viele unerkannte Spammails
bringt. Für einen Test habe ich versucht die beiden User mit derselben
Konfiguration scannen zu lassen, der Scan lief mittels spamc, wie auch
in der .procmailrc.
Hier das Ergebnis nach Löschen der user_prefs und awl Eintraege beider user:
------------------------------------------------
User 1:
/usr/bin/spamc -U /var/run/spamd -R -l -y <
/home/pacs/wme00/users/common/tmp/1173179286.23887_0.h02.hostsharing.net\:2\,S
7.9/5.0
Spam detection software, running on the system "h02.hostsharing.net", ...
Content analysis details: (7.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.2 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[58.51.62.61 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[58.51.62.61 listed in combined.njabl.org]
1.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
------------------------------------------------
User 2:
:~/.spamassassin$ /usr/bin/spamc -U /var/run/spamd -R -l -y <
/home/pacs/wme00/users/common/tmp/1173179286.23887_0.h02.hostsharing.net\:2\,S
5.1/5.0
Spam detection software, running on the system "h02.hostsharing.net", ...
Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.2 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type=
entry
0.2 HTML_BADTAG_20_30 BODY: HTML message is 20% to 30% bad tags
0.1 HTML_NONELEMENT_20_30 BODY: 20% to 30% of HTML elements are
non-standard
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML
2.5 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[58.51.62.61 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[58.51.62.61 listed in combined.njabl.org]
Hat jemand eine Erklärung?
Vielen Dank
Rainer
More information about the Support
mailing list