[Support] spamassassin / spamc: stark unterschiedliche pro user

Rainer Thieringer hsnews at web-me.de
Tue Mar 6 17:01:03 CET 2007


Hallo HS,

ich verwende gleich .procmailrc und .spamassassin/user_prefs für den 
Maileingang verschiedener User. Trotzdem sind die Ergebnisse absolut 
unterschiedlich, was mir bei einem User viele unerkannte Spammails 
bringt. Für einen Test habe ich versucht die beiden User mit derselben 
Konfiguration scannen zu lassen, der Scan lief mittels spamc, wie auch 
in der .procmailrc.

Hier das Ergebnis nach Löschen der user_prefs und awl Eintraege beider user:

------------------------------------------------
User 1:

  /usr/bin/spamc -U /var/run/spamd -R -l -y < 
/home/pacs/wme00/users/common/tmp/1173179286.23887_0.h02.hostsharing.net\:2\,S 

7.9/5.0
Spam detection software, running on the system "h02.hostsharing.net", ...

Content analysis details:   (7.9 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.2 HTML_20_30             BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML
  3.5 BAYES_99               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
                             [score: 1.0000]
  3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
                             [58.51.62.61 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
  0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL      RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
                             [58.51.62.61 listed in combined.njabl.org]
  1.0 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

------------------------------------------------
User 2:

:~/.spamassassin$ /usr/bin/spamc -U /var/run/spamd -R -l -y < 
/home/pacs/wme00/users/common/tmp/1173179286.23887_0.h02.hostsharing.net\:2\,S 

5.1/5.0
Spam detection software, running on the system "h02.hostsharing.net", ...

Content analysis details:   (5.1 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
  0.2 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE       Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= 
entry
  0.2 HTML_BADTAG_20_30      BODY: HTML message is 20% to 30% bad tags
  0.1 HTML_NONELEMENT_20_30  BODY: 20% to 30% of HTML elements are 
non-standard
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.5 HTML_20_30             BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML
  2.5 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
                             [58.51.62.61 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
  1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL      RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
                             [58.51.62.61 listed in combined.njabl.org]


Hat jemand eine Erklärung?

Vielen Dank
Rainer


More information about the Support mailing list